Important: There is no standard, fixed, or required commission rate in real estate. All commission rates are fully negotiable — by law and in practice. Any commission figures referenced on this site are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as typical, customary, or recommended rates.

Veterans United RESPA

Peyton et al. v. Veterans United Home Loans et al.

OngoingMortgage Lending
Share:
Quick Facts

Filed

February 18, 2026

Jurisdiction

Western District of Missouri

Plaintiff Firm

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro

Next Milestone

Early litigation; class certification pending

Key Issue

Veterans United Home Loans accused of RESPA violations through illegal kickback scheme with affiliated real estate agents (35% commission fees) and deceptive marketing falsely implying VA affiliation; steering military veterans to higher-cost loans

Industry Impact

First major lawsuit targeting mortgage lender steering practices and RESPA violations in post-NAR settlement era; expands commission litigation from real estate to mortgage lending

Case Timeline
Key events and milestones in this case

Alleged Violations Period

January 1, 2020 - Present

Veterans United Home Loans allegedly engages in illegal kickback scheme with affiliated real estate agents and steers military veterans to higher-cost loans

Class Action Filed

February 18, 2026

Three veteran homebuyers file class action in Western District of Missouri alleging RESPA violations and deceptive practices by Veterans United Home Loans, Mortgage Research Center LLC, Veterans Realty, and Realty Search Solutions LLC

Case Status

February 2026

Early litigation stage; defendants have not yet filed answer or response; class certification proceedings pending

Share Your Experience
Help others recognize mortgage violations by sharing your story. Your testimonial will be reviewed before publication.

Your story will help others recognize similar violations. We may edit for clarity and length.

Homeowner Stories

Real experiences from homeowners affected by mortgage lending violations.

Sarah M.
Chicago, IL • Major National Bank
Redlining

I applied for a mortgage in 2020 for a home in a predominantly minority neighborhood. Despite having excellent credit and a stable income, I was repeatedly denied or offered rates significantly higher than friends with similar financial profiles in other areas. After seeing the CFPB enforcement actions, I realized I may have been a victim of redlining.

Loan Date: March 2020

Michael T.
Phoenix, AZ • Regional Mortgage Company
Kickbacks

When refinancing my home, my loan officer strongly pushed me toward a specific title company and appraiser. I later discovered through court documents that there was an illegal kickback arrangement between my lender and these service providers, which inflated my closing costs by thousands of dollars.

Loan Date: August 2021

Jennifer L.
Boston, MA • Online Mortgage Platform
Price-Fixing

I used an online mortgage rate comparison platform in 2022. I thought I was getting competitive rates, but after the Optimal Blue lawsuit came to light, I realized the platform may have been artificially inflating rates through coordination with lenders. My 'best rate' was likely not competitive at all.

Loan Date: November 2022

Discussion0 comments

Log in or comment as a guest

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!