BREAKING: Veterans United Home Loans Faces RESPA Lawsuit - Commission Litigation Expands to Mortgage Industry

Listen to this Article
BREAKING: Veterans United Home Loans Faces RESPA Lawsuit - Commission Litigation Expands to Mortgage Industry
AI narration powered by ElevenLabs.

⚖️ Case Update — April 14, 2026
Veterans United Files Motion to Dismiss
Veterans United Home Loans has filed a motion to dismiss Peyton v. Veterans United Home Loans (Case No. 2:26-cv-04039, W.D. Mo.), making three core arguments:
Failure to state a claim — VU argues plaintiffs failed to present "any concrete and particularized injury" and do not allege a specific deceptive or fraudulent act with sufficient particularity.
Jurisdictional challenge — The motion argues the claims are based on transactions that occurred outside of Missouri, raising a venue question for the Western District.
"Recycled complaint" defense — VU's attorneys contend the complaint is "fueled by confidential competitors and largely recycled from complaints filed against other large mortgage lenders," a direct reference to Hagens Berman's parallel Zillow RESPA case.
In a public statement, VU Communications Manager Chad Moller said: "To be crystal clear, Veterans United Home Loans and Veterans United Realty have never held themselves out as the VA or any other government agency. Never. We're proud of our track record over the last 24 years."
What happens next: The court will rule on the motion to dismiss. If denied, the case proceeds to discovery — a significant escalation. If granted, plaintiffs may appeal or refile. Hagens Berman has declined to comment publicly. No ruling has been issued as of April 19, 2026.
Sources: HousingWire (Apr 14, 2026) · Real Estate News (Apr 15, 2026)
February 19, 2026 - The legal assault on real estate industry practices has taken a dramatic new turn. Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, the powerhouse firm behind the groundbreaking Sitzer/Burnett verdict, has filed a class action lawsuit against Veterans United Home Loans, alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).
A major mortgage lender that serves our veterans is now being sued for allegedly running a kickback scheme. Veterans United Home Loans supposedly steered military families to specific real estate agents and got paid for it—which is illegal under federal law. The same legal team that won $1.8 billion against the real estate industry is now going after the mortgage side of the house. If you got a Veterans United mortgage between 2020-2026 and they pushed you toward a particular agent, you might be owed money. This is about holding powerful financial institutions accountable when they rig the system against the people they're supposed to serve.
The Expansion Beyond Brokerages
This lawsuit represents the first major expansion of commission-related litigation beyond real estate brokerages and into the mortgage industry. The complaint alleges that Veterans United engaged in illegal kickback schemes by steering borrowers to affiliated real estate agents in exchange for referral fees.
What This Means for Consumers
The lawsuit alleges that Veterans United:
Steered military veterans and their families to preferred real estate agents
Received kickbacks disguised as marketing fees
Inflated costs for homebuyers through hidden referral arrangements
Violated RESPA's prohibition on referral fees
The Legal Strategy
Cohen Milstein's decision to target the mortgage industry demonstrates the firm's comprehensive approach to dismantling what they view as systemic anticompetitive practices across the entire real estate transaction ecosystem.
Key allegations include:
Illegal Referral Fees: Veterans United allegedly received payments from real estate agents in exchange for borrower referrals
Steering Practices: The lender allegedly pressured borrowers to use specific agents
Hidden Costs: Consumers allegedly paid inflated prices due to these arrangements
Impact on the Industry
This lawsuit could have far-reaching implications:
Mortgage Lenders: Other lenders with agent referral programs may face similar scrutiny
Real Estate Agents: Agents paying referral fees to lenders could face liability
Consumers: Homebuyers may be entitled to compensation for overpaid fees
What Homeowners Should Know
If you obtained a mortgage through Veterans United Home Loans and were referred to a real estate agent, you may be eligible to join this class action lawsuit. Key eligibility factors include:
Obtained a Veterans United mortgage between 2020-2026
Were referred to or encouraged to use a specific real estate agent
Purchased a home using that agent
The Broader Context
This lawsuit follows the massive settlements in the NAR commission cases:
Sitzer/Burnett: $1.8 billion jury verdict
NAR Settlement: $418 million
Keller Williams: $20 million (homebuyer settlement)
Moehrl: $42 million (six-brokerage settlement)
Next Steps
The case is in its early stages, but given Cohen Milstein's track record, the mortgage industry should prepare for intense scrutiny. Class certification hearings will determine the scope of potential damages.
For more information:
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as the case progresses.
Share this post
Stay current — get the weekly digest
Every Tuesday: the week's most important real estate antitrust developments, practice tips, and case updates — free.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy.
