Important: There is no standard, fixed, or required commission rate in real estate. All commission rates are fully negotiable — by law and in practice. Any commission figures referenced on this site are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as typical, customary, or recommended rates.

DeYoung — Louisiana MLS Antitrust

DeYoung et al. v. National Association of Realtors et al.

OngoingMLS Rule Challenges
Share:
Quick Facts

Filed

January 2025

Jurisdiction

Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge)

Plaintiff Firm

Plaintiffs' Counsel (Middle District of Louisiana)

Next Milestone

Second amended complaint filed; NAR and Louisiana co-defendants expected to move to dismiss; ruling expected summer 2026

Key Issue

Brokers Carla DeYoung and Carlos Alvarez, along with agents Tammy Jo Williams and Darlene Currie, allege that NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), the New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors (NOMAR), ROAM MLS, and other Louisiana-based defendants engaged in anticompetitive and exclusionary practices by conditioning access to MLS data and MLS-related platforms on compulsory membership in local, state, and national Realtor associations. The plaintiffs — who include both brokers and agents — argue this bundled membership requirement constitutes an illegal tying arrangement that forecloses competition and forces practitioners to pay dues to organizations they may not wish to join in order to access the MLS tools essential to their business.

Industry Impact

Original federal antitrust and Fair Housing Act claims were dismissed without prejudice in late March 2026 based on the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendations. In late April 2026, the federal court granted plaintiffs' motion to file a second amended complaint, giving them another opportunity to replead the dismissed federal claims. NAR stated it 'supports pro-competitive, pro-consumer local broker marketplaces' and that 'each local MLS sets their own requirements for determining access to the platform.' The case is one of several parallel MLS membership challenges filed across the country in 2024–2025, suggesting a coordinated litigation strategy targeting the bundled membership model.

Case Timeline
Key events and milestones in this case

DeYoung Filed

January 2025

Complaint filed in Middle District of Louisiana by brokers Carla DeYoung and Carlos Alvarez, along with agents Tammy Jo Williams and Darlene Currie, alleging anticompetitive MLS access restrictions tied to compulsory Realtor association membership

Briefing on Motion to Dismiss

2025–2026

NAR and Louisiana co-defendants (GBRAR, NOMAR, ROAM MLS) file motion to dismiss; parties brief the issues

Federal Claims Dismissed Without Prejudice

Late March 2026

Court dismisses federal antitrust and Fair Housing Act claims without prejudice, based on report and recommendations of Magistrate Judge; plaintiffs given opportunity to amend

Second Amended Complaint Granted

Late April 2026

Federal court grants plaintiffs' motion to file a second amended complaint, allowing them to replead dismissed federal claims alleging conditioning of MLS access on compulsory Realtor association membership

Second Amended Complaint Filed

May 2026

Plaintiffs file second amended complaint repleading federal antitrust claims; NAR and co-defendants expected to move to dismiss again

MLS Membership Trilogy

This case is part of a coordinated wave of lawsuits challenging NAR's mandatory Realtor association membership requirements for MLS access. Each takes a different legal angle — together they form the most comprehensive attack on the bundled membership model since the DOJ's 2020 investigation.

Deep Dive: Comparing the Three MLS Membership Lawsuits

How DeYoung, Hardy, and Zea differ in legal theory, geography, and odds of success

Discussion0 comments

Log in or comment as a guest

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!